This is a work in progress, more content will be added soon
We have a mini wind tunnel with a fairly small throat, Vasari, Ansys, openFOAM and a big wind tunnel. What are the odds that they’ll give us results that are roughly the same? Will some way of testing give vastly misleading results?

Vasari is by far the easiest to use, but it’s ready made boundary conditions don’t seem to represent real life in any particularly meaningful way.
The tests demonstrate two models run in Vasari as a means of comparing the program against a physical model in the small wind tunnel and against the CFD results of ANSYS . One is a cube built within a box matching the dimensions of the small wind tunnel and the other is a cube with only a base built into the model.
From the results of the first wind tunnel simulation it is evident that the walls have a significant effect on the wake of the cube. The second test results have similar velocity solution to the tests run by Arup in ANSYS. The results are not as close for the pressure simulation.







Little wind tunnel
Big wind tunnel



Consider the city dynamics – the intangible real-time data flow from the city, the invisible changing and unpredictable nature of a city. How will this influence the collaborative process and outcomes for designing dynamic and responsive architecture? The cluster is interested in making the intangible tangible, riding and analysing the real-time data flow, integrating performative and tactile design decisions to hands-on “make and do” physical and digital prototyping. This cluster will perform multiple rapid iterations of modelling, prototyping, and testing of digital and physical representations.








